使用帮助  
会员浏览
    unavail的日记 用户日记页 -- 关闭
 
【大国博弈】 三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失字体[ ] 颜色[ 绿 ]
分类:随笔小记  创建于:2012-08-25 被查看:2724次 [收藏:日记|作者] [评论]
BestSong200 | DreamDance | Verses | Fav-short | 2008-12, 2009-1, 2 | 08 Crisis | 08 Election | 新人新诗 | 新人报到 大国政治| 2010 | 20112012-1 2 | 醉是音乐”俱乐部 1, 2 | 

【大国博弈】 2012

国与国 ==> 是竞争。
普世价值重要 ==> 更重要是 ==> 保护国家子民。


三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失

文章来源: - 新闻取自各大新闻媒体,新闻内容并不代表本网立场!
打印本新闻 (被阅读 5234 次)

三星电子(Samsung Electronics Co., 005930.SE)就美国法院的裁决结果发表回应称,对美国消费者来说,苹果公司(Apple Inc., AAPL)的胜诉是一个损失。

三星电子此前被裁定向苹果公司支付逾10亿美元专利侵权赔偿金。

三星电子在上述裁决结果公布后发布声明称,美国法院的裁决将导致消费者的可选择范围缩小,企业的创新意愿下降,并且可能推高产品价格。

三星电子表示,上述裁决并非全球其他法院正在审理的针对果公司的专利诉讼案的最终定论。


※ 来源: http://www.JiaoYou8.com ※
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-26 23:45:54  [评论]
// thanks Friend for sharing. no panosia. lots of countries have same problem either too weak administration or too strong.

損害本國公民利益的執政者,不僅是無能,尤其是無恥!
 
zikou
61岁,比利时
评论于:2012-08-26 09:36:16  [评论]
 損害本國公民利益的執政者,不僅是無能,尤其是無恥!
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-26 02:06:53  [评论]
unavail 发表评论于
// he he
// kia, hyndai automobiles == 10% U.S. market.
// it is ok for free competition, but U.S. home of automobiles Detroit is a ghost town.
// it is pathetic for people living in this country losing so many jobs.

================================================================================
三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-25 20:46:25  [评论]
unavail 发表评论于
// he he
// 抄袭 ==> 剽窃 ==> 商业盈利 ==> 犯罪。
// ==> 严惩不贷 ==> 零度容忍 (Zero Tolerance)。

================================================================================
三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-25 19:36:41  [评论]
unavail 发表评论于
// ha ha
// 国家子民 care more about their jobs, not 美国消费者 care more about the cheap products.
// Cheap products can't make you happy or rich, if you lost your job or you work under more pressure. more job competition and more job workload can't make you happy.

===============================================================================
三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-25 19:29:54  [评论]
unavail 发表评论于
// he he
// it is the simple truth that who wins (dominates) the market, who is the king.
// because people are willing to throw their money into your pocket for the good products or services (with cheap or reasonable price) you provide.


===============================================================================
hebeier 发表评论于 2012-08-25 16:13:11

I don't understand why so many people think Apple is an innovative company!

===============================================================================
三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失
 
unavail
45岁,加州
评论于:2012-08-25 19:06:21  [评论]
unavail 发表评论于
// he he
// 抄袭 == 犯罪
// 抄袭 == 零度容忍 (Zero Tolerance)
// in U.S., plagiarism is disapproved in both academic world and commercial world. it is infringement of intellectual copyright. one take liability of plagiarism from depriving of job or academic or commercial titles, fines, or even go to jail.

Plagiarism is defined in dictionaries as the "wrongful appropriation," "close imitation," or "purloining and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions," and the representation of them as one's own original work,[1][2] but the notion remains problematic with nebulous boundaries.[3][4][5][6] The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe only in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement, while in the previous centuries authors and artists were encouraged to "copy the masters as closely as possible" and avoid "unnecessary invention."[7][8][9][10][11][12]

The 18th century new morals have been institutionalized and enforced prominently in the sectors of academia and journalism, where plagiarism is now considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics, subject to sanctions like expulsion and other severe career damage. Not so in the arts, which not only have resisted in their long-established tradition of copying as a fundamental practice of the creative process,[12][13][14] but with the boom of the modernist and postmodern movements in the 20th century, this practice has been heightened as the central and representative artistic device.[12][15][16] Plagiarism remains tolerated by 21st century artists.[13][14]

Plagiarism is not a crime per se but is disapproved more on the grounds of moral offence,[7][17] and cases of plagiarism can involve liability for copyright infringement.

【大国博弈】 2012

国与国 ==> 是竞争。
普世价值重要 ==> 更重要是 ==> 保护国家子民。

================================================================================
rimmaapl 发表评论于 2012-08-25 15:56:12

三星说:我是抄袭的,我的便宜.消费者你们买我的,这样可以鼓励apple创新.

南冰洋 发表评论于 2012-08-25 15:35:53

这里除了为三星工作的, 都支持苹果。 三星当年考抄日本起家, 现在又想故伎重演。 没想到美国人可没那么好讲话。

================================================================================
三星:苹果公司的胜诉对美国消费者是一个损失
 
更多"随笔小记"类日记
【但值良宵总泪零】傻春
【不该问的问题】傻春
【致无痕】傻春
【秋恋】傻春
【香雪海的秋天】傻春
【踮起脚尖--吻你】傻春
【梦中丁香】傻春
別人崇拜的只是他們的需求,不是你。special168
创记录sea_lavender
多此一举sea_lavender
查看全部...
 
   
关于我们 - 联系我们 - 服务条款 - 隐私权政策
© Unknown Space , since 1996